|
Do you want some examples? So, look: Common sense: “In an increasingly competitive market, Generalizations: “Everyone knows that …”; Adjectives in excess: “This method is objective, clear, direct and effective.”; Rhetorical questions: “You know what I'm talking about, don't you?” Of course, these structures are not prohibited, but they must be used appropriately. And it is your job as a reviewer to evaluate what adds meaning and content to the text and what does not. . Do research on the topic addressed After seeing that the content has some weaknesses that make it poorer, you need to adapt those parts and the only way to do this is by understanding what is relevant and, therefore, should be included.
Therefore, the ideal is that you research some texts that deal with USA WhatsApp Number Data issues related to the topic. As Review work here at Rock is collaborative, it is necessary to understand that the end result is the conjunction of the skills of everyone involved. Thus, you also become responsible for the quality of the content that is delivered to the client. . Remember that you are the authority on the text “I took a text to review, but I don't want to affect the editor! What I do?". Check out! And change everything that you find wrong and that is not appropriate to the client's pattern or strategy. The content produced here on Rock is not and should not be about “the author”.
They need to answer the purpose described in the guideline. You should give this priority when reviewing the content, okay? Also remember that for the freelancer to improve you must point out where they are making a mistake. . Edit the content appropriately Did you notice that the editor has good arguments, but repeated them in all the subtitles? No problem! Simply change the text, removing redundant pieces that impoverish the content. As you now understand the topic of the text a little better, modify it to complement the ideas, remove phrases or reorganize the connection of the arguments – always carefully.
|
|